Challenge the nature of the Mental Health System detainment laws in the United States of America. People have been detained arbitrarily and on top of the detainments they have been tortured with "pain causing" drugs and other forced medical procedures.
Who is the judge of someone's "mind"? How can that even be a thing? Should we not charge people for their actions and make them be accountable for such? If we start picking and choosing who we run through which system, where do we draw the line? I hope people can see why there is going to be problems with that method...
The mental health system of the day interferes with real justice:
1) It allows some people to "get away with murder" by claiming insanity.
2) It interferes with the "spiritually free" or "exploring person" who chooses to do their own thing. As long as that person is not wrongly infringing upon another - should that not be their freedom of choice? Furthermore, if the person in question is wronging someone(creates a victim) then we should charge them with a crime and run them through the Criminal Justice System.
What is the right and expectation to be held accountable?
LIBERTY - the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behavior, or political views.
What is fair? - As a US citizen - member nation of the UNITED NATIONS, I would like to ask for reparations for myself and others whom have been violated BY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES with respect to the US Constitution, yet not limited to the US Constitution. Quite honestly - what I would call HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Amendment III
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
Amendment VII
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Amendment III
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
Amendment VII
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Some of you may contend to say that the "laws" which violate people with respect to "forced mental institution systems" are just that - LAWS.
A point I would make is that you CAN NOT fairly create a system which circumnavigates the criminal justice system that quite literally could detain anyone for any number of frivolous reasons without charging them with a real crime, not giving the individual proper protections which prevent from cruel and unusual punishment and fair trial by jury.
From my understanding of history, one reason why the forefathers of this nation created these amendments was by in part to protect "new-politicians" and more importantly "political ideas" from being wrongly attacked by the current political powers that be... I do not know if the forefathers(more importantly, you here and now) ever imagined a system that we are dealing with today where people are forcibly detained without being charged with a crime and then force drugged with painful substances.
A point I would make is that you CAN NOT fairly create a system which circumnavigates the criminal justice system that quite literally could detain anyone for any number of frivolous reasons without charging them with a real crime, not giving the individual proper protections which prevent from cruel and unusual punishment and fair trial by jury.
From my understanding of history, one reason why the forefathers of this nation created these amendments was by in part to protect "new-politicians" and more importantly "political ideas" from being wrongly attacked by the current political powers that be... I do not know if the forefathers(more importantly, you here and now) ever imagined a system that we are dealing with today where people are forcibly detained without being charged with a crime and then force drugged with painful substances.
CHANGING THE SYSTEM
FOR EXTRA CREDIT check this video - three HUGE AREAS - interconnected nature
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2KV5CqHzBA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2KV5CqHzBA
NOTE : BE INFORMED regarding the story of NAZI GERMANY - learn from your historical tragedies. ADAPTATIONs / TRANSLATIONs
Following the "law" is NOT always the right thing to do in some societies... it all depends what the law says to do...
LAW REVISION OVERHAUL - Starting point and My advise : Define the victim(s) or potential victim(s) and then go from there as far as how you write your laws to protect the innocent.
Be fair and do not wrongly discriminate on CULTURES.
EXAMPLES: 1) some may like TOBACCO and some may like CANNABIS. 2) some may like "JESUS BELIEFS" and some may like "ALIEN BELIEFS". If they are NOT wronging anyone such should be their freedom, if they are wronging someone charge them with the WRONG they did to another.
Be fair and do not wrongly discriminate on CULTURES.
EXAMPLES: 1) some may like TOBACCO and some may like CANNABIS. 2) some may like "JESUS BELIEFS" and some may like "ALIEN BELIEFS". If they are NOT wronging anyone such should be their freedom, if they are wronging someone charge them with the WRONG they did to another.